Saturday, October 1, 2011

More New and Significant Information

On Monday, Cheryl Roberts indicated that the discovery in May by the South Bay Task Force of two species of aquatic fauna--the American Eel (Anguilla rostrata) and the Blueback Herring (Alosa aestivalis)--was one of the things that had delayed revisions to the GEIS and LWRP. Roberts reported that those discoveries were determined to be neither new nor significant.

Undaunted, the South Bay Task Force sent notification yesterday to the Common Council, as SEQR lead agency, and the Department of State, Division of Coastal Resources, of another discovery in South Bay: the Spongy Arrowhead (Sagittaria montevidensis var. spongiosa), an annual plant that is a New York State Threatened Species. The memo annnouncing the discovery concludes: "Whether or not the Draft GEIS should have been more specific as to the terms of the proposed conditional use permitting requirements for activities in the South Bay area, the vagueness of the terms as presented in the Final GEIS is a serious inadequacy, and a liability for the document. This becomes more apparent and urgent while new rare species continue to be found in South Bay. (Plant species such as the Spongy Arrowhead are identifiable only late in the growing season.) . . . We trust that the SEQR Lead Agency will appreciate the magnitude of yet another NYS Threatened species being present in the South Bay, and that both agencies will revisit the issue [of] all of the South Bay's rare flora and fauna before issuing their Findings Statements."   

1 comment:

  1. Thanks for the support Carole.

    Well before the recent GEIS edits, we asked the DOS in our public comments to the proposed South Bay SCFWH that the state change it's language in their Rating Form to reflect the previously undocumented herring in South Bay:

    "The wording of the DCR Rating Form for this proposed SCFWH should be changed from 'blueback herring still have access to the creek' to the phrase 'blueback herring are in the creek.'”

    The question was always whether herring would use the bay, not whether the bay was inaccessible.

    Proving that the species is present in South Bay is significant.

    It was indeed "undocumented" until we came along. The City was wrong to dismiss the report.

    (Admittedly we weren't previously aware of eel records even though we did ask the right people.)

    The fact that our other new discovery letters were ignored is just another inexplicable inadequacy of this SEQR review.

    ReplyDelete